.jpg)
The High Court’s decision to reinstate ACT Wazalendo’s presidential candidate, Mr. Luhaga Mpina, has set the stage for a more competitive General Election while reinforcing the judiciary’s role in safeguarding constitutional order.
Delivering the verdict in Dodoma, Judge Kagomba annulled the suspension imposed by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), ruling it unconstitutional, void, and without effect.
The court directed INEC to immediately allow Mr. Mpina to submit his nomination forms and resume the process from where it ended on August 27, 2025.
“The barrier issued by INEC is unconstitutional, void, and of no effect. Therefore, the plaintiffs should be given an immediate chance to submit their forms,” Judge Kagomba stated, stressing that the suspension breached principles of natural justice and was imposed without jurisdiction.
Mr. Mpina had been barred after INEC, acting on a report from the Registrar of Political Parties, alleged that he violated ACT Wazalendo’s internal nomination rules.
The party challenged the move at the High Court, arguing that it had not been granted the right to be heard.
With the ruling, ACT Wazalendo reclaims its position in the presidential contest, joining 17 other parties cleared to field candidates.
Analysts say the reinstatement not only boosts the party’s morale but also signals a more unpredictable electoral landscape.
“The verdict is more than a win for one candidate; it is a statement on the strength of Tanzania’s democratic institutions,” said a political science lecturer at the University of Dar es Salaam, who requested anonymity.
“It highlights the judiciary’s willingness to check the powers of electoral bodies and ensure that due process is observed.”
Reacting to the ruling, Mr. Mpina described the judgment as a victory for justice and democracy.
“This ruling affirms that following proper legal channels is essential in protecting democratic rights. I am grateful to the High Court for upholding the constitution and ensuring fairness,” he said.
For ACT Wazalendo, the decision provides renewed energy ahead of the campaign trail, while for INEC, it raises fresh questions over its interpretation of electoral mandates.
As the country edges closer to the polls, the judgment underscores the delicate balance between electoral institutions and judicial oversight in shaping the future of Tanzania’s democracy.