By Adonis Byemelwa
In the gentle morning hush of the University of Dar es Salaam, as the jacarandas shed their purple blossoms across the campus paths, a quiet unease hangs in the air.
The lecturers who once filled these corridors with debate and optimism now carry a different burden, one of apprehension, reflection, and moral duty.
However, The University of Dar es Salaam (UDSM)'s management has distanced itself away from the claim. In a public notice signed by Vice Chancellor Prof. William A. L. Anangisye, UDSM emphasized that UDASA is an independent professional association with its own leadership and positions, which do not represent the official stance of the university.
“The University of Dar es Salaam remains a public institution guided by academic principles, the national constitution, public ethics, and laws, while engaging in constructive dialogue that promotes sustainable development and national unity,” the statement said.
On October 23, 2025, the University of Dar es Salaam Academic Staff Assembly (UDASA) has spoken, and its recent statement on the state of human rights and the 2025 general elections is nothing short of a moral reckoning.
It is not a political manifesto, nor an academic abstraction. It is, rather, a cry from within — from men and women who live, teach, and breathe the daily contradictions of a nation that promises freedom but punishes dissent.
Their words are measured yet heavy, steeped in the lived reality of a Tanzania that seems to have drifted from its constitutional promise that “the people are the basis of all authority.”
UDASA’s statement resonates because it is not a detached theory. It captures what it feels like to watch colleagues vanish without a trace, to hear whispers of abductions that no one dares to investigate, to witness bright students grow fearful of asking the simplest political questions in class. Behind its polished language lies a palpable sense of disillusionment, the quiet heartbreak of a people whose patriotism is met with suspicion.
For decades, Tanzania prided itself on being a haven of peace and political stability in the region. Yet beneath that image, a darker narrative has been steadily unfolding. UDASA’s reflection makes it painfully clear that peace built on silence is not peace at all.
When citizens disappear without explanation, when journalists are detained, and when academics censor themselves before the state does, what remains of freedom?
The statement carefully weaves together these threads, linking the erosion of rights to the climate surrounding the upcoming 2025 general elections. It does not just warn about political violence or electoral malpractice.
It speaks of something more insidious, the slow suffocation of civic life. UDASA fears, rightly, that if these patterns persist, Tanzania may enter its next election not as a confident democracy, but as a nation trembling under its own contradictions.
Their message is a sober reminder that elections are not mere rituals of ballot casting. They are tests of a country’s moral contract between ruler and ruled.
If that contract is broken by intimidation, unlawful detention, and selective justice, then no tally of votes can restore legitimacy.
UDASA’s analysis goes further, hinting at what many Tanzanians feel but hesitate to voice: that the political playing field remains worryingly tilted, and the price of speaking truth to power has become unbearably high.
The implications of this statement are profound. When the country’s foremost intellectual community, one that has nurtured presidents, ministers, and judges, raises an alarm about the state of human rights, it is not just an academic exercise. It is a sign that the conscience of the nation is stirring.
UDASA’s declaration reveals that even within the ivory towers, fear has crept in. The lecture hall, once a sanctuary for free inquiry, now feels like contested ground. Researchers hesitate to publish politically sensitive findings. Discussions on governance are carefully tiptoed around. Some lecturers recount receiving quiet warnings to “avoid controversial topics.”
This is what makes the UDASA statement so painfully authentic. It is not written from the comfort of theory but from the lived experience of suppression. It reminds us that when academic freedom is stifled, the entire nation loses its moral compass. The university has always been a mirror to society; if that mirror cracks, the reflection it offers is distorted.
Beyond the campus gates, the statement paints a wider picture of exclusion. Citizens who dare to oppose the state often find themselves marginalised; their rights are brushed aside under the guise of national security.
Political opponents are detained, journalists silenced, activists labelled as enemies of progress. The rhetoric of unity masks a deeper fragmentation, between those who hold power and those who merely endure it.
UDASA’s call for national reconciliation and accountability carries both urgency and grace. It does not seek vengeance but justice. It asks for truth before peace, for a reckoning before celebration. It reminds the authorities that forgiveness without acknowledgement is hollow, and development without dignity is unsustainable.
The academics urge a credible inquiry into abductions and disappearances, a truly independent electoral body, and a firm separation of state and party interests within the security apparatus. They are, in essence, demanding a return to the values Tanzania once held sacred: fairness, dialogue, and humanity.
But their statement also carries a quiet warning. If ignored, this erosion of trust will not stop at the university gate or the courtroom door. It will seep into every aspect of national life. A country where people fear their own voices cannot innovate, cannot progress, cannot heal.
The youth, who should be dreaming of transforming the nation, will instead dream of leaving it. The brightest minds will turn silent or turn away.
The tragedy, as UDASA sees it, is not just political; it is spiritual. It is the withering of a national ethos that once prided itself on ujamaa, unity, and mutual respect. The assembly’s statement reads almost like a eulogy for the Tanzania that once was, hopeful, compassionate, and guided by principle.
Yet beneath that melancholy lies a quiet defiance. There is still faith, however fragile, that things can be repaired, that courage can once again outshine fear.
This sentiment echoes across the continent, where intellectuals, journalists, and activists are rediscovering their voices against shrinking civic spaces. UDASA’s courage, then, does not stand alone. It belongs to a growing movement of African thinkers who refuse to let their societies sink silently into repression disguised as order.
Internationally, the timing of UDASA’s statement could hardly be more significant. Amnesty International’s latest reports expose the same wounds that the University of Dar es Salaam’s academics now speak of with quiet anguish: the forced evictions of the Maasai in Loliondo, the arbitrary arrests of opposition members, and the disappearance of critics whose only crime was daring to speak out.
These accounts sketch a picture that is both painful and familiar, revealing a pattern of violations that mock the spirit of Tanzania’s Constitution and weaken the credibility of its democratic institutions.
Amnesty’s findings go beyond merely echoing UDASA’s concerns; they fill in the silences left by official narratives and give international context to local suffering. They serve as a reminder that while a government may silence its citizens for a time, it cannot erase the truth of their experiences. Every act of repression leaves a trace; every silenced voice becomes a memory that refuses to fade.
As the 2025 elections draw closer, UDASA’s statement reads less like an academic declaration and more like a plea for national reflection. It asks Tanzanians to confront a difficult question: will fear remain a way of life, or will courage reclaim its place in public discourse? It calls upon leaders to remember that authority is not owned but entrusted, and that true patriotism lies in accountability, not obedience.
If this call is heeded, 2025 could become a moment of renewal, a turning point where trust is rebuilt and justice restored. If ignored, repression may again purchase silence but never loyalty. Yet, as the purple petals fall across the university lawns, one senses that hope still lingers, fragile perhaps, but alive, for Tanzania’s unfinished promise of freedom and dignity.
Meanwhile, the university further urged all eligible Tanzanians to participate peacefully and lawfully in the general elections scheduled for October 29, 2025.
“We appeal to all citizens to exercise their democratic rights with peace, calm, patriotism, and respect for the principles of democracy and national stability,” Prof. Anangisye added.